B−
EPS overshot — Adj EBITDA undershot. Uranium segment near-perfect; blind spots in Fuel Services and EPS mechanics.
Uranium realized price (US$66.21/lb) and volume (7.8M lbs) were accurately modeled. However, our adj EPS estimate of US$0.41 overshot actual US$0.34 by 19% — largely because WW's equity-accounting treatment (net loss of −US$33M despite US$89M adj EBITDA) suppresses reported EPS. Meanwhile, Adj EBITDA of US$369M beat our US$307M model by +20% driven by WW's strong outage-season performance (US$89M vs US$41M modeled). The EPS/EBITDA divergence reflects WW D&A from acquisition-related inventory purchase accounting — a structural mechanic to build into the Q2 model.
Our Base EPS
US$0.41
pre-earnings est · C$0.56
Actual Adj EPS
US$0.34
−17% vs our model · C$0.47
Consensus
US$0.36
actual missed consensus · C$0.49
All monetary figures in USD (Q1 2026: ×0.726 USD/CAD · Q1 2025 ref: ×0.702). CCJ reports natively in C$ — see press-release tables above for source figures.
| Line Item |
Our Bear |
Our Base |
Our Bull |
✓ ACTUAL |
vs Base |
vs Consensus |
Verdict |
| Uranium Sales |
6.0M lbs | 7.0M lbs | 8.0M lbs |
7.8M lbs |
+11.4% | — |
✓ Hit — above base, near bull |
| Realized Price (US$/lb) |
US$66.21 | US$62.55 | US$66.21 |
US$66.21 |
−0.5% | — |
✓ Close — model used C$91.71 (~US$66.54); actual US$66.21, within US$0.33 |
| Uranium Revenue |
US$399M | US$466M | US$533M |
US$517M |
+10.9% | — |
✓ Hit — volume beat lifted revenue |
| Fuel Services Rev. |
US$70M | US$70M | US$70M |
US$97M |
+39.6% | — |
✗ Miss — conversion volumes & pricing beat |
| Total Revenue |
US$469M | US$536M | US$602M |
US$613M |
+14.5% | — |
✓ Beat — above bull scenario |
| WW Adj. EBITDA (CCJ share) |
US$36M | US$41M | US$44M |
US$89M |
+117.9% | — |
✗ Miss — outage season far busier than assumed |
| Adj. EBITDA |
US$266M | US$307M | US$350M |
US$369M |
+20.3% | — |
✗ Miss — WW drove EBITDA above bull case |
| Net Earnings (IFRS) |
— | — | — |
US$95M |
— | — |
△ Note — WW D&A suppressed IFRS earnings |
| Adj. Net Earnings |
US$129M | US$160M | US$193M |
US$147M |
−8.1% | — |
~ Close — below base, above bear |
| Adj EPS (diluted) |
US$0.33 |
US$0.41 |
US$0.49 |
US$0.34 |
−16.1% |
−US$0.02 |
✗ Overshot — WW equity-method D&A compressed adj EPS |
| IFRS EPS (diluted) |
not modeled separately |
US$0.22 |
— |
— |
— Ref — IFRS net earnings US$95M |
| Production (U segment) |
— | 3.6M lbs | — |
6.2M lbs |
+72.2% | — |
✓ Beat — McArthur/Cigar ahead of Q1 seasonal pace |
| Unit Cost (US$/lb produced) |
— | US$28.82/lb | — |
US$24.72/lb |
−14.2% | — |
✓ Beat — produced costs well below model |
| FY Guidance |
— | Maintained | — |
Maintained |
— | — |
✓ Hit — 29–32M lbs FY confirmed |
✓ What the model got right
- Realized price: US$66.21/lb actual vs ~US$66.54 modeled (C$91.71/lb from CCJ price sensitivity table at US$85.60 spot, converted at ~0.726 USD/CAD) — within US$0.33 (0.5%). Contract pricing behaved as expected.
- Volume range: 7.8M lbs landed above base (7.0) and near bull (8.0) — spread correctly sized.
- Guidance hold: Called "maintained" — correct. 29–32M lbs FY confirmed; Westinghouse US$404M / C$557M guide unchanged.
- Adj. net earnings direction: US$147M actual landed between bear (US$129M) and base (US$160M) — close.
- Production costs: Actual US$24.72/lb total production cost was better than modeled (US$28.82/lb) — Q1 mine performance strong.
✗ Where the model was off
- Adj EPS overshot: US$0.41 model vs US$0.34 actual (−17%). WW net loss of −US$33M (due to acquisition D&A) suppresses EPS even when WW adj EBITDA is strong. Must model WW below-EBITDA items separately.
- Westinghouse EBITDA: US$41M modeled vs US$89M actual (+118%). Q1 outage calendar was far busier than seasonal assumption. Primary model improvement for Q2.
- Fuel Services: US$70M modeled vs US$97M actual (+40%). Conversion volumes and pricing both beat — stronger-than-expected UF6 conversion demand.
- Production Q1 pace: 6.2M lbs actual vs 3.6M modeled (+72%). McArthur River/Cigar Lake ran well ahead. Watch whether Q1 front-loading pulls from H2 or is a higher run-rate.
Methodology note: Pre-earnings model published April 25, 2026 (10 days before CCJ reported May 5, 2026). Estimates derived from: CCJ 2025 Annual Report price sensitivity table, EIA-923 seasonal delivery patterns, Westinghouse FY guidance prorated by outage season, FERC Form 1 fuel services benchmarks, 2025 MD&A unit cost guidance. Consensus from MarketBeat (5 analysts). Actuals from CCJ Q1 2026 News Release, May 5, 2026.